Close Menu
, officially titled "Reliability Prediction Procedure for Electronic Equipment," was released to refine the previous methodologies, update the part failure rate databases, and introduce new calculation methods (Method I, II, and III) that account for field data and lab testing.
SR-332 provides three main methods for performing reliability predictions, moving from basic generic estimates to highly specific, laboratory-tested data: 1. Method I: Generic Component Rates
): Based on the Arrhenius equation, this factor accounts for thermal stress on internal components. Higher operating temperatures exponentially increase failure rates. Electrical Stress Factor ( SFcap S sub cap F telcordia sr-332 issue 3 pdf
While the PDF is available on various online forums and file-sharing sites, we strongly recommend sourcing the document directly from Telcordia (now part of Ericsson) or an authorized standards distributor. Obtaining the standard from the official source ensures you have the most current, complete, and unaltered version. Detailed information on how to do this is provided at the end of this article.
Telcordia SR-332 Issue 3 was published in 2001. This version of the standard provides guidelines and requirements for the reliability and maintainability of telecommunications equipment. The document focuses on: Detailed information on how to do this is
(\lambda = 9.0 + 24.0 + 3.96 = 36.96) FIT. MTBF = (10^9 / 36.96 \approx 27) million hours (≈ 3,080 years).
When the product (or a highly similar predecessor) is already deployed in the field. and unaltered version.
A basic Bill of Materials (BOM) and the intended operating environment. Method II: Combining Laboratory Data
The industry's trust in this standard stems from its collaborative development. Issue 3 is touted as the "only hardware reliability prediction procedure developed from the input and participation of a cross-section of major industrial companies." This lends a high level of credibility to its predictions, free from the bias of any single supplier. It is widely regarded as the second most popular electronic reliability prediction standard, following MIL-HDBK-217.